<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lady Gaga Makes the (Mistaken) Case for Celibacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/</link>
	<description>Feminism and Gender Issues at Princeton University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 04:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charliej</title>
		<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charliej]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equalwrites.org/?p=2493#comment-3685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very basic definition in a dictionary is:

1: the state of not being married
2   a : abstention from sexual intercourse
      b : abstention by vow from marriage 

So - actually - anyone who&#039;s not married could, justifiably, say that they are celibate! You&#039;re right - she is abstaining, but therefore, is also celibate. I don&#039;t think people should bring religion into a choice to abstain (remain celibate) nor should we criticize her for her wording choice. It&#039;s an amazing message that I think more people should listen to - especially young women in America in our society who believe that the disposable sexual lifestyle that has become so popular is a sign of feminism and independence! 
:) that&#039;s all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very basic definition in a dictionary is:</p>
<p>1: the state of not being married<br />
2   a : abstention from sexual intercourse<br />
      b : abstention by vow from marriage </p>
<p>So &#8211; actually &#8211; anyone who&#8217;s not married could, justifiably, say that they are celibate! You&#8217;re right &#8211; she is abstaining, but therefore, is also celibate. I don&#8217;t think people should bring religion into a choice to abstain (remain celibate) nor should we criticize her for her wording choice. It&#8217;s an amazing message that I think more people should listen to &#8211; especially young women in America in our society who believe that the disposable sexual lifestyle that has become so popular is a sign of feminism and independence!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equalwrites.org/?p=2493#comment-1994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a Princeton student, and neither is that singer.  Her body, her words.  And no, no one ever got raped because some guy someplace mistakenly used a word wrong.  They get raped because men rape them.  Put the blame where it belongs: in the mind of the perpetrator and not in the dictionary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a Princeton student, and neither is that singer.  Her body, her words.  And no, no one ever got raped because some guy someplace mistakenly used a word wrong.  They get raped because men rape them.  Put the blame where it belongs: in the mind of the perpetrator and not in the dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: Janis</title>
		<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[re: Janis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equalwrites.org/?p=2493#comment-1986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sure, you&#039;re right in that people don&#039;t /own/ words. but part of living in a society is using them responsibly, and as ameliatd wrote above, the words have different connotations in different contexts. i don&#039;t know if you&#039;re a princeton student or not, but these are words that have come up a lot this year with the &quot;debate&quot; over the chastity center and numerous columns in the prince dealing with the topic. it&#039;s important to keep our terms straight so we know what everyone else is talking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure, you&#8217;re right in that people don&#8217;t /own/ words. but part of living in a society is using them responsibly, and as ameliatd wrote above, the words have different connotations in different contexts. i don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re a princeton student or not, but these are words that have come up a lot this year with the &#8220;debate&#8221; over the chastity center and numerous columns in the prince dealing with the topic. it&#8217;s important to keep our terms straight so we know what everyone else is talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equalwrites.org/?p=2493#comment-1984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who gives a crap?  Her definition is the only one that matters.  No one has a trademark on the word celibate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a crap?  Her definition is the only one that matters.  No one has a trademark on the word celibate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ameliatd</title>
		<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ameliatd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equalwrites.org/?p=2493#comment-1976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on this distinction (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celibacy#Abstinence_and_celibacy) between abstinence and celibacy, I think we can pretty safely say that Lady Gaga would better described herself as &quot;abstinent.&quot;  The words may have similar dictionary definitions, but they have very different religious and cultural connotations.

Thanks for commenting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on this distinction (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celibacy#Abstinence_and_celibacy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celibacy#Abstinence_and_celibacy</a>) between abstinence and celibacy, I think we can pretty safely say that Lady Gaga would better described herself as &#8220;abstinent.&#8221;  The words may have similar dictionary definitions, but they have very different religious and cultural connotations.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://equalwrites.org/2010/03/02/lady-gaga-makes-the-mistaken-case-for-celibacy/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equalwrites.org/?p=2493#comment-1975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if you look up celibacy in the dictionary (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/celibacy) you would find it to be defined as:
1 : the state of not being married
2 a : abstention from sexual intercourse b : abstention by vow from marriage

Thus, your argument would be false on numerous levels. To my knowledge Lady Gaga is not married = celibate under (1). She seems to be abstaining from sexual intercourse, as you pointed out = celibate under (2a). Furthermore, she seems to have vowed (albeit to herself and, I suppose, the press) to abstain from sex/marriage = celibate under (2b).

Looks to me like she&#039;s three times a (celibate) Lady.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you look up celibacy in the dictionary (<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/celibacy" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/celibacy</a>) you would find it to be defined as:<br />
1 : the state of not being married<br />
2 a : abstention from sexual intercourse b : abstention by vow from marriage</p>
<p>Thus, your argument would be false on numerous levels. To my knowledge Lady Gaga is not married = celibate under (1). She seems to be abstaining from sexual intercourse, as you pointed out = celibate under (2a). Furthermore, she seems to have vowed (albeit to herself and, I suppose, the press) to abstain from sex/marriage = celibate under (2b).</p>
<p>Looks to me like she&#8217;s three times a (celibate) Lady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

